Les liens parfois conflictuels entre ex\u00e9g\u00e8se et sciences du texte remontent, pourrait-on dire, au moment o\u00f9 l\u2019on a commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 lire la Bible car, pour pouvoir le faire, chaque \u00e9poque doit recourir \u00e0 des m\u00e9thodes qui semblent ad\u00e9quates. Le sujet est donc tr\u00e8s vaste. La bibliographie consacr\u00e9e \u00e0 cette question est, elle aussi, plus qu\u2019abondante. Dans la perspective d\u2019amener quelques \u00e9l\u00e9ments \u00e0 la r\u00e9flexion commune, la question sera abord\u00e9e sous forme de retour sur les m\u00e9thodes contemporaines, en tentant de mettre en \u00e9vidence forces et limites de celles-ci, de la fa\u00e7on la moins caricaturale possible.Exegesis and text sciences
\nThe at times conflictual ties between exegesis and text sciences go back, we might say, to the time when people began to read the Bible, because, in order to do so, each period has to rely on methods that appear to be adequate. The subject is thus quite vast. The bibliography dedicated to it is likewise extensive. In order to contribute a certain number of elements to a common reflection, this question will be addressed through a return to contemporary methods, all the while endeavouring to show their strengths and limits in the least caracaturing way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"